The Mother Of A Prince Essay - 1531 Words

She was the daughter of a Prince who governed a small state in Greece. Her Mother was also of royal blood. Her parents were without children. They were idolaters. They continually offered sacrifices and prayers to their false gods. A doctor from Rome named Publius lived in the palace in the service of her father. This doctor professed Christianity. Seeing the affliction of her parents, by the impulse of the Holy Spirit, he spoke to them of Christianity, and promised to pray for them if they consented to receive Baptism. The grace which accompanied his words enlightened their understanding and triumphed over their will. They became Christians and obtained the long desired happiness that Publius had assured them as the reward of their conversion. At the moment of her birth, they gave her the name of Luminas, an allusion to the light of Faith of which she had been, as it were, the fruit. The day of her Baptism they called herFilumena, or Daughter of Light, because on that day she was born to the Faith. The affection which her parents bore her was so great that they had her always with them. She made a promise to Jesus Christ of her virginity belongs to him. Philomena’s parents did all they could to convince her to surrender to Diocletian’s wishes and theirs too. Philomena answered her parents that she cannot do their wish, for the love of a man to break the promise that she had made to Jesus Christ. Her virginity belongs to him. She can no longer dispose of it. But herShow MoreRelatedCritique: Love and Cinderella1268 Words   |  6 Pagesthirsty and magical mother, but her legitimacy begins to lack through her analysis over the topic of love in the fairytale. In Grimm’s fairytale, Panttaja makes it apparent that Cinderella in fact has a mother throughout the whole story. In the beginning of Grimm’s fairytale, Cinderella’s mother tells her, â€Å"†¦I shall look down on you from heaven and always be with you† (Grimm 628). This direct quote from Grimm’s fairytale validates Panttaja’s claim because it shows how the mother directly states sheRead MoreCinderella Happy Ending872 Words   |  4 PagesCinderella is not so motherless; instead, her deceased mother is with her through the whole the story. The author wants the readers to understand that Cinderella is well mothered and she has a happy ending. Panttaja explains how Cinderella has defeated her step mother and her daughters. The author states the fairytale is about mother and daughter bonding and their loving relationship never dies. Panttaja describes how the deceased mother has prevailed and kept her promise to her daughter afterRead More The Structure and Underlining Meanings of Rapunzel by Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm1406 Words   |  6 Pagesfor the tale to be read time and time again by the eager young mind. The opening of the story establishes a number of things: the characters (with the exception of the prince), their dispositions, and the first task. The short introduction is also in itself a short story, with its own three-part structure. Rapunzel’s mother, also known as the wife, by persuading her husband to steal a head of lettuce from the witch, sends him on his journey. The husband’s acceptance of his task finalizes theRead MorePsychological Problems In Cinderella994 Words   |  4 Pagessibling rivalries, and gaining a feeling of self-worth. Cinderella’s narcissistic problems all start with her step-mother and step-sisters. From the moment they stepped into Cinderella’s life they beat her down. The two sisters â€Å"took away her beautiful clothes, dressed her in an old grey smock, and gave her some wooden shoes† (Grimm 117). The narcissistic tendencies continued when the step-mother took away Cinderella’s bed forcing her to sleep on the floor in front of the fire. This is how Cinderella gotRead More Hamlet as Victim and Hero Essay1260 Words   |  6 PagesHamlet as Victim and Hero      Ã‚   Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, a Shakespearean tragedy, tells the story of Prince Hamlet, who gained the knowledge of a terrible incident that his kingdom had suffered. Claudius, the king of Denmark and Hamlets uncle, had killed his own brother, the king, who was also the father of Hamlet, and married his brothers widow. Hamlet suffered these traumas to a severe degree, and his only relief was to defeat his human weaknesses and correct the wrongs created by hisRead MoreDisney Version Of The Cinderella Movie912 Words   |  4 Pagesabout a girl who s father remarries after her mothers death. Soon after being married he died, leaving cinderella with her evil step mother and two step sisters. Cinderella step mother forced her to become the servant of their house. In the movie Another Cinderella Story the beginning story line starts off the same. However, the disney version of cinderella is a animated cartoon version with many fantasies and unrealistic talking mice and fairy god mo thers. In the modern version of the cinderella movieRead MoreGreece : A Country Enriched With Culture And History Essay1423 Words   |  6 Pagesthe authors decided to have the orphan be her own heroine and go after her prince. Deciding her own faith, rather than just waiting in ashes or a dark corner for her prince to come and save her. Manna and Miakidou’s orphan is a young, self-determined women who takes her destiny into her own hands. The story begins like any other Cinderella story with a family of three. The daughter was very well taken care of by her mother who gave her baths in musk-scented water while combing her â€Å"long, dark hairRead MoreMoral Analysis Of Cinderella839 Words   |  4 Pagesstates that the mother is perceived as absent and it is up to Cinderella to overcome this obstacle, but also that her mother plays a key role in the story, that is otherwise not recognized in the original fairytale. Throughout her article she expresses her thoughts through assumptions, word strands, and binaries. Panttaja addresses some unusual statements regarding the original fairytale â€Å"Cinderella †. She firsts states that while the original fairytale suggests that Cinderellas mother is â€Å"absent†Read MoreComparison Of Slavery InThe Classic Slave Narratives By Mary Prince And Frederick Douglass?1180 Words   |  5 Pages In the story of Mary Prince and Frederick Douglas you see all the heart ache that these slaves had to go through. There is similarity in which all slaves stories are the same but different in their own way. When learning about slavery we already know about all the bad things they went through but its all different when you actually hear it from their point of few. Which is really horrifying to learn the truth of what these slaves had to face. When it comes to Mary Prince and Frederick Douglas thereRead MoreCinderella -Analysis1058 Words   |  5 Pagesreason behind her marrying the prince. Pantajja claims that Cinderella isn’t really motherless and helpless as the old fairy tale wanted the readers to believe. Her mother played a vital role in her success in rising to a position of power and influence. (Pantajja, 1993, p. 644) Portrayed as motherless in the post-Freudian world, Panttaja claimed it wasn’t true by using logos in her analysis. The old fairy tale wants us to feel sorry for her because her mother is not around to guide and take

Case Study Supply Chain Management - 972 Words

Abstract This paper articulates that supply chain management is all about providing the right products, at the right time, to customers at low cost. To attain competitive advantage, organizations should think radically about business process optimization to maximize profits and gain new customers. Forward looking companies are going beyond improving customer service, partnering commitment and improved quality controls in service supply chain. Successful companies are managing warranty costs, improving their product through upgraded service supply chain operations, which generate more revenues. Firms must identify what the company can do to improve their practices and services while classifying what their employees are capable to perform at†¦show more content†¦Performing these require superior manufacturing, marketing and managerial activities. In other words, they need to identify what the company has to improve while classifying what their supply chain associates are capable to per form at quality level functions, therefore the supply chain remains efficacious. There are some queries firms essentially need to achieve their goals in a competitive supply chain while providing the best service, they will set a target market (customer), use advertisement strategies to attract more customers and being able to reach that competitive advantage. Once they’ve identified the customer, they recognize the customers’ values, consequently choose what standards they will highlight first and then assess the customer s satisfaction with the service had provided. Competitive advantage is the capability to generate greater profits than competition thanks to the diversity of products and services provided, as well as quality and low cost transportation. Appropriate supply management allows a quick response from supply chains to encounter clients’ demands. In order to conserve competitive advantage businesses require to have shorter lead times. In addition, it includes more than just goods offered by suppliers, firms may provide similar or equal products that are priced similar, have

Australian Securities Investment Commission-Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Australian Securities Investment Commission? Answer: Introducation The case of ASIC v Lindberg [2012] VSC 332; 91 ACSR 640 is related to the breach of directors duties and the defendant director being negligent towards the operations of the organization. In this case the plaintiff was the Australian Securities and Investment Commission was the plaintiff and Mr Lindberg the Managing director of AWB LIMITED was the defendant. Civil penalty proceedings have been instituted by the ASIC against the defendant Mr Lindberg for the contraventions of the Corporation Act 2001 (Cth) (CA). The breach was related to the involvement of the director in wheat trade with Iraq for his organization through misusing Oil For food Program which was administrated by United Nations. The defendant director had been negligent over providing bribes to the government officials in Iraq in order to secure business deals. The director was found in this case to not apply diligence and care in relation to the operations of the company in Iraq and thus leading to loss for the company . The proceedings were commenced in late 2009 against the defendant; however the proceedings had been adjourned to ensure that AISC can amend its claim against the defendants[1]. There was a lengthy negotiation between the parties to the case as the hearing did not resume for the purpose of settling the proceedings. The defendant through the process of negotiation agreed formally that he had made four contraventions in relation to section 180(1) of the CA. The main admission was that with respect to the provisions of the section the defendant director was not able to deploy reasonable skill and care with respect to his obligations towards the organization and all other allegations against him had been dismissed[2]. The parties to the case have provided a statement related to the contraventions which have been admitted, the statement is in relation to the facts which have been agreed and submission which have been agreed on the relevant legal principles. The appropriate penalties in relation to the contraventions which have been agreed have also been submitted by the parties, which are a disqualification period of two years and a pecuniary penalty of $100000[3]. As a declaration of contravention cannot be made by consent of ASIC and the alleged director unless a basis is found by the court in relation to the facts that evidence satisfy the statutory requirements which signifies that the contraventions have been made. The burden of in this case is on the ASIC to prove the contraventions in relation to the balance of probabilities. The duties breached by the directors In the case of ASIC v Cassimaties the director have allegedly violated the provisions of the CA related to section 180(1). The section states that the directors and officers of an organization have the responsibility of implementing the best possible skills they have towards the company and continue the operations of the company with care and diligence. The actions of the directors and the other officers have to be in good faith and in best interest of the company. The section is said to be violated when a reasonable director placed in the same position and circumstances of the alleged violator of the duty would have not indulge in actions which had been done by the violator. To make it simple the actions of the alleged contravener of the section are compared to those of a reasonable person to analyze the actions were in the best interest of the company or not. If it is found that the reasonable person would not have done such actions which have been committed by the directors or officers than it is said that the duty have been violated. The test under section 180(1) has been used by various cases such in Australia such as the case of Shafron v Australian Securities and Investments Commission[4] and (ASIC) v Cassimatis[5]. Analysis of the decision The distinct feature in this case was that the contraventions made by the directors have already been admitted by the by and have been accepted by the ASIC. The penalties in relation to the contraventions have also been decided upon by the parties to this case. The role of the court in this case is only to determine that question that whether the statutory requirements to establish the contraventions have been meet or not. The parties in the case have wanted a pecuniary penalty of $100000 as they have stated that the contraventions made by the director are serious. The role of the court in this case is also to provide that the contravention made by the defendant is serious or not to result in pecuniary penalties[6]. In the case of Dean-Willcocks v Commissioner of Taxation[7] it was stated by Austin J that the court is never bound to the admission made by the parties to the case. In this case it was provided by the judge that the admission of the parties may be rejected by the court if it is found that the admissions seek a judgment which is not present naturally[8]. The judge in this case ruled that his task is to find out whether the evidence provided to him is enough to establish the breach of section 180(1) of the CA. the jurisdiction of the court is established by the making of a declaration in relation to pecuniary penalty order s per section 1317G and disqualification order under s206 (c)[9] The court provided that it is satisfied that the contravention of section 180(1) have been made by the defendant as have been admitted by him. All the contraventions are related to the admission of negligence by the directors towards his operations in relation to the company. The court also found that no contravention made by the director depicted that there was intention, moral turpitude or dishonesty of committing such actions. The court found that there was a failure on the part of the defendant to do his duties in relation to the company which a reasonable director would have done in the same circumstances. The court in this case also concluded the fact that the breaches which have been made by the directors were serious. The court also ruled that it believes that the asked penalties and suspension period is within the permissible rage also it is at the higher end of the range. The court therefore provided that the pecuniary penalty of $100000 along with the suspension period wer e appropriate to be provided to the parties of the case. This was because the court in relation to the first contravention of recovering Tigris debt found that the director have failed to undertake enquiries that the recovery in question was in accordance to the UN resolution and had been initiated with the approval or knowledge of the UN. The court found this on the basis of the evidence provided by the parties and therefore established the first contravention. The court was provided with the evidence that the non enquiry was for a certain period and which have been actually made after a certain time by the director. Therefore the contravention is an omission and not a contravention done knowingly[10]. The second contravention was related to failure of the director to notify the board of the company about the fact that as three former employees were not interviewed who had important information about AWB misusing the OFFP the project rose was limited. The evidence in relation to the contravention provided to the court depicts that the director had knowledge that the three former employees were likely to have relevant information. It was also within the knowledge of the director that the boards of AWB and AWBI had information in relation to the purpose of project rose. There is no evidence to show that a reasonable person would have given such information or not, however the court relied on the admission of the director to state that the contravention 2 also had been made. There was evidence to show that the director had lack of expertise in relation to investigation but still the director must have told the board about it. Thus the directors have been negligent and have not willfully violated duties in relation to the second contravention[11]. The third contravention was related to the fact that the director did not give information to the board that inflammation of price has been used to recover the Tigris Debt as per contract AI670 and AI680. The director also did not inform the board with respect to the agreement entered upon by the company with Tigris, or the payment to Tigris have been misdescribed by the agreement not as a debt but a fee along with describe the commission kept by AWBI as a success fee[12] The court in this case found that the contravention of section 180(1) had been made by the defendant director as he had failed not only to exercise his powers but also to discharge his duties in form of a managing director and chief executive of AWB with reasonable diligence and care which would have been done by a reasonable person in the same circumstances. This was because evidence provided by the parties provide that the director had been given the Tigris agreement but he was not able to read it or read it and failed to understand that it states that the money to be given to Tigris was described as a service fee. In the same way that of contravention 1 and 2 it is implied that a reasonable person would have properly read the agreement and understood its meaning and thus the contravention 3 under section 180(1) of the CA also has been established. The failure of the defendant to specifically provide information to the board that the Tigris Debt have been obtained through the use o f Inflation price as per contract 1670 and A 1680 from the Escrow Account of UN[13]. The contravention 4 in this case is related to the failure on the part of the director to provide information to the board that evidence had been received by the UN Independent Inquiry Committee with respect to OFFP (IIC) from former officials of the Iraqi Government. The information provided that Alia was used to direct funds to Iraq and kickbacks had been paid to all suppliers which included AWB who also made payment through Alia always. The evidence depicted that there was an actual failure on the part of the defendant to inform the board and thus like the other three contraventions the fount was also found to be made[14]. Take away points Even if the directors and the ASIC agree to the fact that contraventions have been made by the directors and also set out penalties for it the court in order to approve such penalties and contraventions the court have to be satisfied in relation to the statutory requirements. The declaration made and the penalties by the parties to the case are accepted by the courts if statutory requirements are made even if the penalties are at the higher end of the range. To avail pecuniary penalties serious breach have to be established References ASIC v Lindberg [2012] VSC 332; 91 ACSR 640 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis (No 8) - [2016] FCA 1023 Corporation Act 2001 (Cth) Shafron v ASIC [2012] HCA 18 [1] ASIC v Lindberg [2012] VSC 332; 91 ACSR 640 at [1] [2] ASIC v Lindberg [2012] VSC 332; 91 ACSR 640 at [2] [3] ASIC v Lindberg [2012] VSC 332; 91 ACSR 640 at [3] [4] [2012] HCA 18 [5] (No. 8) [2016] FCA 1023. [6] ASIC v Lindberg [2012] VSC 332; 91 ACSR 640 at [6] [7] (2004) 49 ACSR 325 (Dean-Willcocks). [8] ASIC v Lindberg [2012] VSC 332; 91 ACSR 640 at [8] [9] ASIC v Lindberg [2012] VSC 332; 91 ACSR 640 at [10] [10] ASIC v Lindberg [2012] VSC 332; 91 ACSR 640 at [26] [11] ASIC v Lindberg [2012] VSC 332; 91 ACSR 640 at [40] [12] ASIC v Lindberg [2012] VSC 332; 91 ACSR 640 at [45] [13] ASIC v Lindberg [2012] VSC 332; 91 ACSR 640 at [51] [14] ASIC v Lindberg [2012] VSC 332; 91 ACSR 640 at [65]

Unions Cause And Effects Essays - Labour Relations,

Unions: Cause And Effects Ever since the dawn of time it has been the tendency of workers to try and better their conditions, the slaves in Egypt wanted to change the way they were treated, as did the slaves in the Americas. It has also been the tendency of employers to try and get more for less. They want the most work and productivity from employees with the least amount of pay on their behalf. It is now the trend for workers in the auto industry to form unions to help them in their fight for better working conditions. Unions date back to the days of the American Revolution when journeymen blacksmiths formed pacts to help each other receive better pay on jobs they performed and prevent underbidding on jobs. Since those days many unions have been formed, and they have helped a great many people. The best known and most influential of which is the United Auto Workers, or UAW. Autoworkers had it rough before the days of the unions. They worked oppressive schedules, which usually ran from January through September and maybe even October. During those months, they would work long hours with very little reward. It was not uncommon for them to clock up to 16 hours a day. Occasionally they would come to work and get sent home with no pay. Their foremen ran their lives. If a foreman wanted his car washed on a Sunday, workers would have to do it. Whatever the foremen said was law, no matter how unfair or unjust it was. If workers didn't do what a foreman said, they could face unemployment. During the working months of January through September workers would bust their backs to perform their jobs, most of them not being able to perform their duties past the age of 35. During the months of October through December workers would be let go for the retooling period, so they were unemployed at that time. They would face these harsh winter months with no unemployment pay or compensation to help through Christmas. Then come January when the factories were coming back on-line, workers had no way of knowing if they were still going to have a job. Foremen had complete control over who was being called back to work, if workers were over 35 they were not called back. Most of the workers would bribe foremen so they would have a job in January. Child labor was also a big practice back in those days. Children would work long hours, up to 16 hours a day. They would get paid as little as half a penny for every hour they worked. Most children were employed by the age of 5, and it was likely that they would not live past 25. Unions have changed a lot of things for workers in America today. With the help of unions and the government (through legislative acts passed by union lobbyists) we now have forty-hour weeks, minimum wage, and overtime pay. People have benefits like health insurance, profit sharing, retirement and pension plans, and paid vacation and holidays. We have unemployment pay for those who get let go in times of recession and corporate downsizing. Minors now have laws stating exactly what type of work they can do, people must now be at least 18 to perform dangerous jobs, minors can only work and go to school a maximum of 48 hours a week. I think we can all thank the unions for what they have done for us. Before unions, employers had it made. They could pay as little as they could get people to work for, which reduced their overhead costs. Once they paid for materials, most of what they made went straight into their pocketbooks. With the help of unions and actions such as striking, workers no have a voice in what is said and done in their place of employment. It is no wonder that the average American worker wants to be a part of a union, with the benefits involved, who wouldn't. Creative Writing